Balaji, Poorna (2017) A tree cut is not the same as a tree planted: Understanding ‘quick fix’ solutions to development consequences. Eartha.
Eartha_Balaji, P._22 February 2017.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (2MB) | Request a copy
Abstract
Traffic and trees have recently found a persistent presence in everyday discussions among people and newspapers in the city of Bangalore. In an attempt to tackle traffic, the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) has proposed building the widely contested steel flyover and other road widening projects which will result in cutting of several trees across the city. Cutting of trees is, of course, only one of several important reasons why these projects can be deemed featherbrained. In this article, I will stick with trees. BDA has defended that they will plant 60,000 saplings as compensatory afforestation which is much more than the trees that may be cut. This seems like a rational solution, or is it?
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Copyright of this article belongs to authors |
| Subjects: | A ATREE Publications > K Popular Articles |
| Divisions: | Academy for Conservation Science and Sustainable Studies > PhD Students Publications |
| Depositing User: | Ms Suchithra R |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Nov 2025 09:36 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Nov 2025 09:36 |
| URI: | http://archives.atree.org/id/eprint/810 |

Altmetric
Altmetric