Garrett, Rachael D. and Meyfroidt, Patrick and de Bremond, Ariane and Wartenberg, Ariani and Barbieri, Lindsay and Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro and Acheampong, Emmanuel and Addoah, Thomas and Adeleye, Matthew and Alexander, Peter and Brandão, Joyce and Anthony Coomes, David and Ellis, Erle C. and J., Fajardo and Jacobi, Johanna and Leach, Melissa and Lele, Sharachchandra and Llanque Zonta, Aymara and Lyons-White, Joss and Martin, Adrian and Messerli, Peter and EJ, Milner-Gulland and Müller, Daniel and Mills, Morena and Nantongo Kalunda, Pauline and Pascual, Unai and Rueda, Ximena and Ryan, Casey M. and R, Siddappa Setty and Pham, Thu Thuy and Zagaria, Cecilia (2025) Evaluation Of A Participatory Monitoring System For Non-Timber Forest Products: The Case Of Amla (Phyllanthus Spp.) Fruit Harvest By The Soliga In South India. Royal Society open science, 12.
garrett-et-al-2025-policy-principles-for-sustainable-and-just-land-systems.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (887kB)
Abstract
Land systems are the nexus of many global sustainability and justice challenges. Here we present eight guiding principles (P1–8) for improved land system policies following the heuristic stages of a policy cycle. The principles are as follows: embrace recognitional justice (P1), be politically strategic (P2), consider multiple policy goals (P3), address systemic issues (P4), take an integrative scope (P5), foster co-development (P6), adopt clear and monitorable targets (P7) and integrate diagnostic and adaptive capacities (P8). We then explore how well policies align with these principles in two globally relevant cases (land-based climate mitigation and biodiversity-friendly agriculture). In both cases, we find that when policies align poorly with the principles at the agenda-setting stage, there is further misalignment at the policy formulation stage. In the instances when recognitional justice is embraced at the onset, policies subsequently integrate more diverse goals and co-development, but they insufficiently consider political strategy and struggle to handle system complexity. Nonetheless, we identify promising policy mixes that provide benefits to multiple actors, integrate multiple goals, take an integrative scope and have strong monitoring and adaptation, aligning well with multiple principles. Further investigation of these principles could reveal promising policy pathways for land systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Copyright of this article belongs to the Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | governance, science–policy, sustainability transitions, conservation, climate, food, transformation. |
| Subjects: | A ATREE Publications > G Journal Papers |
| Divisions: | Rohini Nilekani Philanthropies Centre for Environment and Development > Forest, Governance and Livelihood |
| Depositing User: | Ms Suchithra R |
| Date Deposited: | 28 Nov 2025 11:13 |
| Last Modified: | 28 Nov 2025 11:13 |
| URI: | http://archives.atree.org/id/eprint/1226 |
Dimensions
Dimensions